For our final week, the theme is sex offenses and the Internet:

A. Video voyeurism is any of the following:

(1) The use of any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, or an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device, for the purpose of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping a person where that person has not consented to the specific instance of observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping and either:

(a) It is for a lewd or lascivious purpose.

(b) The observing, viewing, photographing, filming, or videotaping is as described in Paragraph (B)(3) of this Section and occurs in a place where an identifiable person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

(2) The transfer of an image obtained by activity described in Paragraph (1) of this Subsection by live or recorded telephone message, electronic mail, the Internet, or a commercial online service.

(3) The manipulation of a victim who has not yet attained the age of seventeen or who is reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen to use any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device or an unmanned aircraft system equipped with any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device to photograph, film, or videotape oneself to send to the person manipulating the victim for a lewd or lascivious purpose.

La. R.S. 14:283. A first conviction for this offense carries a fine of not more than $2,000 and/or imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not more than 2 years. For a second or subsequent violation, the fine will be not more than $2,000 and/or imprisonment at hard labor for not less than 6 months nor more than 3 years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. If the filming is of sexual intercourse, masturbation, or the female breasts, or external sexual organs of either gender, the penalty increases to a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment at hard labor for not less than 1 year or more than 5 years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. If the person being filmed is under the age of 17 with the intention of gratifying the sexual desires of the person doing the filming, the penalty is a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment for not less than 2 years or more than 10 years, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. La. R.S. 14:283(B).

It is illegal in Louisiana to forward intimate photographs taken of or by another person without that person’s consent:

A. A person commits the offense of nonconsensual disclosure of a private image when all of the following occur:

(1) The person intentionally discloses an image of another person who is seventeen years of age or older, who is identifiable from the image or information displayed in connection with the image, and whose intimate parts are exposed in whole or in part.

(2) The person who discloses the image obtained it under circumstances in which a reasonable person would know or understand that the image was to remain private.

(3) The person who discloses the image knew or should have known that the person in the image did not consent to the disclosure of the image.

(4) The person who discloses the image has the intent to harass or cause emotional distress to the person in the image, and the person who commits the offense knew or should have known that the disclosure could harass or cause emotional distress to the person in the image.

La. R.S. 14:283.2(A). The penalty for violating this statute is a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not more than 2 years.

A. (1) No person under the age of seventeen years shall knowingly and voluntarily use a computer or telecommunication device to transmit an indecent visual depiction of himself to another person.

(2) No person under the age of seventeen years shall knowingly possess or transmit an indecent visual depiction that was transmitted by another under the age of seventeen years in violation of the provisions of Paragraph (1) of this Subsection.

La. R.S. 14:81.1.1. Violations of Paragraph (1) are governed by the Children’s Code. First offense violations of Paragraph (2) carry a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $250 and imprisonment for not more than 10 days, which shall not be suspended unless the offender is placed on probation with a condition that he perform 16 hours of court-approved community service. A second offense violation carries a fine of not less than $250 nor more than $500 and imprisonment for not less than 10 days nor more than 30 days with the same additional requirements for probation. Finally, a third or subsequent conviction carries a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $750 and imprisonment for not less than 30 days nor more than 6 months with the same probation requirements. La. R.S. 14:81.1.1(D).

Louisiana law prohibits the production, promotion, advertisement, distribution, possession, or possession with intent to distribute pornography involving juveniles; and for a parent, legal guardian, or custodian of a child to consent to the participation of that child in pornography involving juveniles.

E. (1)(a) Whoever intentionally possesses pornography involving juveniles shall be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years or more than twenty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(b) On a second or subsequent conviction for the intentional possession of pornography involving juveniles, the offender shall be fined not more than seventy-five thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years nor more than forty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(2)(a) Whoever distributes or possesses with the intent to distribute pornography involving juveniles shall be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years or more than twenty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(b) On a second or subsequent conviction for distributing or possessing with the intent to distribute pornography involving juveniles, the offender shall be fined not more than seventy-five thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years nor more than forty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(3) Any parent, legal guardian, or custodian of a child who consents to the participation of the child in pornography involving juveniles shall be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years nor more than twenty years, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

(4)(a) Whoever engages in the promotion, advertisement, or production of pornography involving juveniles shall be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years nor more than twenty years, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

(b) On a second or subsequent conviction for promotion, advertisement, or production of pornography involving juveniles, the offender shall be fined not more than seventy-five thousand dollars and imprisoned at hard labor for not less than twenty years nor more than forty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(5)(a) Whoever commits the crime of pornography involving juveniles punishable by the provisions of Paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this Subsection when the victim is under the age of thirteen years and the offender is seventeen years of age or older shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than one-half the longest term nor more than twice the longest term of imprisonment provided in Paragraph (1), (2), and (3) of this Subsection. The sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(b) Whoever commits the crime of pornography involving juveniles punishable by the provisions of Paragraph (4) of this Subsection when the victim is under the age of thirteen years, and the offender is seventeen years of age or older, shall be punished by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than twenty-five years nor more than ninety-nine years. At least twenty-five years of the sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

La. R.S. 14:81.1(E).

Unauthorized use of a wireless router system is the accessing or causing to be accessed of any computer, computer system, computer network, or any part thereof via any wireless router system for the purposes of uploading, downloading, or selling of pornography involving juveniles as defined in R.S. 14:81.1.

La. R.S. 14:73.8(A). The penalty for violations of this statute are imprisonment at hard labor for not less than 2 years nor more than 10 years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, and a fine of not more than $10,000. If the juveniles depicted in the images are under the age of 13, the penalty increases to a term of imprisonment for not less than 25 years nor more than 99 years at hard labor. At least 25 years of that sentence must be without the benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.

Computer-aided solicitation of a minor is:

[C]ommitted when a person seventeen years of age or older knowingly contacts or communicates, through the use of electronic textual communication, with a person who has not yet attained the age of seventeen where there is an age difference of greater than two years, or a person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen and reasonably believed to be at least two years younger, for the purpose of or with the intent to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce the person to engage or participate in sexual conduct or a crime of violence as defined in R.S. 14:2(B), or with the intent to engage or participate in sexual conduct in the presence of the person who has not yet attained the age of seventeen, or person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen.

(2) It shall also be a violation of the provisions of this Section when a person seventeen years of age or older knowingly contacts or communicates, through the use of electronic textual communication, with a person who has not yet attained the age of seventeen where there is an age difference of greater than two years, or a person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen and reasonably believed to be at least two years younger, for the purpose of or with the intent to arrange for any third party to engage in any of the conduct proscribed by the provisions of Paragraph (1) of this Subsection.

(3) It shall also be a violation of the provisions of this Section when a person seventeen years of age or older knowingly contacts or communicates, through the use of electronic textual communication, with a person who has not yet attained the age of seventeen, or a person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen, for the purpose of recruiting, enticing, or coercing the person to engage in commercial sexual activity.

(4) It shall also be a violation of the provisions of this Section when the contact or communication is initially made through the use of electronic textual communication and subsequent communication is made through the use of any other form of communication.

(5) It shall also be a violation of the provisions of this Section when a person seventeen years of age or older knowingly uses another individual who is seventeen years of age or older to contact or communicate with a person who has not yet attained the age of seventeen and there is an age difference of greater than two years between the person contacted and the offender or a person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen and reasonably believed to be at least two years younger than the offender, for the purpose of or with the intent to engage in any of the conduct proscribed by Paragraph (1) of this Subsection.

B. (1)(a) Whoever violates the provisions of this Section when the victim is thirteen years of age or more but has not attained the age of seventeen shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than five years nor more than ten years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(b) Whoever violates the provisions of this Section when the victim is under thirteen years of age shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years nor more than twenty years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(c) Whoever violates the provisions of this Section, when the victim is a person reasonably believed to have not yet attained the age of seventeen, shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than two years nor more than ten years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(d) If the computer-aided solicitation results in actual sexual conduct between the offender and victim and the difference between the age of the victim and the age of the offender is five years or greater, the offender shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars and shall be imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not less than seven years nor more than ten years.

(2) On a subsequent conviction, the offender shall be imprisoned for not less than ten years nor more than twenty years at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.

(3) In addition to the penalties imposed in either Paragraph (1) or (2) of this Subsection, the court may impose, as an additional penalty on the violator, the limitation or restriction of access to the Internet when the Internet was used in the commission of the crime.

La. R.S. 14:81.3.

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime and you would like to set up a consult, give us a call at (318) 459-9111.

This week, the theme is the types of communications you should avoid making (at all), but specifically from your phone or (in particular) your social media:

First of all:

A. No person shall:

(1) Engage in or institute a telephone call, telephone conversation, or telephone conference, with another person, or use any telecommunications device to send any text message or other message to another person directly, anonymously or otherwise, and therein use obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd, or lascivious language, or make any suggestion or proposal of an obscene nature or threaten any illegal or immoral act with the intent to coerce, intimidate, or harass any person.

(2) Make repeated telephone communications or send repeated text messages or other messages using any telecommunications device directly to a person anonymously or otherwise in a manner reasonably expected to abuse, torment, harass, embarrass, or offend another, whether or not conversation ensues.

(3) Make a telephone call and intentionally fail to hang up or disengage the connection.

(4) Engage in a telephone call, conference, or recorded communication by using obscene language or by making a graphic description of a sexual act, or use any telecommunications device to send any text message or other message containing obscene language or any obscene content, anonymously or otherwise, directly to another person, when the offender knows or reasonably should know that such obscene or graphic language is directed to, or will be heard by, a minor. Lack of knowledge of age shall not constitute a defense.

(5) Knowingly permit any telephone or any other telecommunications device under his control to be used for any purpose prohibited by this Section.

La. R.S. 14:285(A). The first violation of this statute is a misdemeanor carrying a penalty of a fine up to $500 and/or imprisonment up to 6 months. The second or subsequent violation carries a potential penalty of a fine of up to $5,000 and/or imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not more than 2 years.

On a similar vein, Louisiana prohibits Cyberbullying: “the transmission of any electronic textual, visual, written, or oral communication with the malicious and willful intent to coerce, abuse, torment, or intimidate a person under the age of 18.” The penalty for this offense is a fine of not more than $500 and/or imprisonment for not more than 6 months.

Cyberstalking, or “action of any person to accomplish any of the following:

(1) Use in electronic mail or electronic communication of any words or language threatening to inflict bodily harm to any person or to such person's child, sibling, spouse, or dependent, or physical injury to the property of any person, or for the purpose of extorting money or other things of value from any person.

(2) Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another repeatedly, whether or not conversation ensues, for the purpose of threatening, terrifying, or harassing any person.

(3) Electronically mail or electronically communicate to another and to knowingly make any false statement concerning death, injury, illness, disfigurement, indecent conduct, or criminal conduct of the person electronically mailed or of any member of the person's family or household with the intent to threaten, terrify, or harass.

(4) Knowingly permit an electronic communication device under the person's control to be used for the taking of an action in Paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this Subsection.

La. R.S. 14:40.3(B). A first conviction for cyberstalking will earn you a fine of not more than $2,000 and/or imprisonment for not more than 1 year. A second conviction within 7 years will earn you imprisonment for not less than 180 days and not more than 3 years and a fine of not more than $5,000. A third or subsequent conviction will result in a fine of not more than $5,000 and imprisonment for not less than 2 years nor more than 5 years. La. R.S. 14:40.3(C).

In Louisiana, it is a crime to post video of yourself committing a crime “for the purpose of gaining notoriety, publicity, or the attention of the public.” La. R.S. 107.4(A). The statute explicitly prohibits:

It shall be unlawful for a person who is either a principal or accessory to a crime to obtain an image of the commission of the crime using any camera, videotape, photo-optical, photo-electric, or any other image recording device and to transfer that image obtained during the commission of the crime by the use of a computer online service, Internet service, or any other means of electronic communication, including but not limited to a local bulletin board service, Internet chat room, electronic mail, or online messaging service for the purpose of gaining notoriety, publicity, or the attention of the public.

La. R.S. 14:107.4(A). The penalty for violating this statute is a fine of not more than $500 and/or imprisonment for note more than 6 months; however, if the underlying criminal activity results in the serious bodily injury or death of the victim of the underlying crime, the fine shall be not more than $2,000 and the term of imprisonment, with or without hard labor, not more than 8 years. La. R.S. 14:107.4(B).

Finally, terrorizing, menacing, and communicating of threats of violence:

A. (1) Terrorizing is the intentional communication of information that the commission of a crime of violence is imminent or in progress or that a circumstance dangerous to human life exists or is about to exist, with the intent of causing members of the general public to be in sustained fear for their safety; or causing evacuation of a building, a public structure, or a facility of transportation; or causing other serious disruption to the general public.

(2) Whoever commits the offense of terrorizing shall be fined not more than fifteen thousand dollars or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than fifteen years, or both.

B. (1) Menacing is the intentional communication of information that the commission of a crime of violence, as defined in R.S. 14:2(B), is imminent or in progress or that a circumstance dangerous to human life exists or is about to exist, when committed under any of the following circumstances:

(a) The actions of the offender cause members of the general public to be in sustained fear for their safety, and a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause such sustained fear.

(b) The actions of the offender cause the evacuation of a building, a public structure, or a facility of transportation, and a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause an evacuation.

(c) The actions of the offender cause any other serious disruption to the general public, and a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause serious disruption to the general public.

(2) Whoever commits the offense of menacing shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than two years, or both.

La. R.S. 14:40.1.

A. Communicating of false information of arson or attempted arson is the intentional impartation or conveyance, or causing the impartation or conveyance by the use of the mail, telephone, telegraph, word of mouth, or other means of communication, of any threat or false information knowing the same to be false, including bomb threats or threats involving fake explosive devices, concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made, or to be made, to commit either aggravated or simple arson.

B. Whoever commits the crime of communicating of false information of arson or attempted arson shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not more than fifteen years.

La. R.S. 15:54.1.

A. The communicating of false information of a bombing threat on school property, at a school-sponsored function, or in a firearm-free zone whether or not such threat involves fake explosive devices is the intentional impartation or conveyance, or causing the impartation or conveyance by the use of the mail, telephone, telegraph, word of mouth, or other means of communication, of any such threat or false information knowing the same to be false.

B. Whoever commits the crime of communicating of false information of a planned bombing on school property, at a school-sponsored function, or in a firearm-free zone as defined in R.S. 14:95.6(A) shall be imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than twenty years.

La. R.S. 15:54.6.

Next time: Sex Crimes and the Internet!

If you or someone you know has been accused of a crime and you would like to set up a consult, give us a call at (318) 459-9111.

The Internet is ubiquitous. We use it to talk to our friends, video call our relatives, order our groceries and takeout, and post pictures of every single thing we’ve ever eaten. It is a wonderful tool. But with it comes a whole world of new ways to commit criminal acts. We’ll be spending the next few blog posts discussing the various computer and internet-related crimes that exist in Louisiana and the penalties for committing those crimes as an overview of some laws you may not have know were out there.

Title 14 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes (the criminal law section) has an entire subsection just for Computer Related Crime, so that seems like a good place to start (Note: This isn’t an exhaustive list of every. single. computer-related crime in Title 14, just the ones I particularly thought were interesting or might be relevant to our clients and friends.:

First of all, did you know that Louisiana has a statute prohibiting “offenses against intellectual property”? Specifically, Louisiana Revised Statutes §14:73.2 prohibits the “intentional (1) Destruction, insertion, or modification, without consent, of intellectual property; or (2) Disclosure, use, copying, taking, or accessing, without consent, of intellectual property.” Louisiana also prohibits the “intentional modification or destruction, without consent, of computer equipment or supplies used or intended to be used in a computer, computer system, or computer network.” La. R.S. 14:73.3 “Offenses against computer equipment or supplies.” It is a crime to intentionally deny “to an authorized user, without consent, of the full and effective use or access to a computer, a computer system, a computer network, or computer services.” La. R.S. 14:73.4 “Offenses against computer users.”

The penalty for violating any of these statutes is a fine of up to $500 and imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both; unless the damage or loss is more than $500, in which case, the penalty goes up to a fine of up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment for not more than 5 years.

Computer fraud is defined as “the accessing or causing to be accessed of any computer, computer system, computer network, or any part thereof with the intent to: (1) Defraud; or (2) Obtain money, property, or services by means of false or fraudulent conduct, practices, or representations, or through the fraudulent alteration, deletion, or insertion of programs or data.” The penalty for violating this provision is a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment at hard labor for not more than 5 years. La. R.S. 14:73.5.

Computer tampering is “the intentional commission of any of the actions enumerated in this Subsection when that action is taken knowingly and without the authorization of the owner of a computer:

(1) Accessing or causing to be accessed a computer or ay part of a computer or any program or data contained within a computer.

(2) Copying or otherwise obtaining any program or data contained within a computer.

(3) Damaging or destroying a computer, or altering, deleting, or removing any program or data contained within a computer, or eliminating or reducing the ability of the owner of the computer to access or utilize the computer or any program or data contained within the computer.

(3) Introducing or attempting to introduce any electronic information of any kind and in any form into one or more computers, either directly or indirectly, and either simultaneously or sequentially, with the intention of damaging or destroying a computer, or altering, deleting, or removing any program or data contained within a computer, or eliminating or reducing the ability of the owner of the computer to access or utilize the computer or any program or data contained within the computer.

La. R.S. 14:73.7(A). The penalty for violating Paragraphs (1) or (2) is a fine of not more than $500 and/or imprisonment for not more than 6 months. The penalty for violating Paragraphs (3) or (4) is a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment, with or without hard labor, for not more than 5 years. If the individual violates Paragraphs (3) or (4) with the intention of disrupting vital services or operations of the state or local government or utility company, or with the intention of causing death or great bodily harm to one or more people, the penalty is a fine of not more than $10,000 and/or imprisonment at hard labor for not more than 15 years.

My favorite statute in this part of Title 14 is §73.9 which prohibits the “Criminal use of Internet, virtual, street-map”: “When an Internet, virtual, street-level map is used in the commission of a criminal offense against a person or against property, an additional sentence for a period of not less than one year shall be imposed. The additional penalty…shall be served consecutively with the sentence imposed for the underlying offense.” (emphasis added) (Note: If you need to commit a crime and you aren't sure how to get there, make sure you go to AAA and get a paper map to avoid being charged with this sentencing enhancement!) (When an online map is used in the commission or attempted commission of terrorism (R.S. 14;100.12(1), the additional sentence is 10 years.

Finally, the Louisiana Legislature prohibits “Only Impersonation.”

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person, with the intent to harm, intimidate, threaten, or defraud, to intentionally impersonate another actual person, without the consent of that person, in order to engage in any of the following:

(a) Open an electronic mail account, any other type of account, or a profile on a social networking website or other Internet website.

(b) Post or send one or more messages on or through a social networking website or other Internet website.

(2) It shall be unlawful for any person, with the intent to harm, intimidate, threaten, or defraud, to send an electronic mail, instant message, text message, or other form of electronic communication that references a name, domain address, phone number, or other item of identifying information belonging to another actual person without the consent of that person and with the intent to cause the recipient of that communication to believe that the other person authorized or transmitted the communication."

La. R.S. 14:73.10. The penalty for violating this provision is a fine of not less than $250 nor more than $1,000 and/or imprisonment for not less than 10 days nor more than 6 months.

Next time: Cyberbullying, Terrorizing, etc…

If you or someone you know has been accused of a Computer Related Crime and you would like to set up a consult, give us a call at (318) 459-9111.

Article 4, Section 5, Subsection (E of the Louisiana Constitution grants the Governor of the State of Louisiana the following powers:

(E) Pardon, Commutation, Reprieve, and Remission; Board of Pardons.

(1) The governor may grant reprieves to persons convicted of offenses against the state and, upon favorable recommendation of the Board of Pardons,1 may commute sentences, pardon those convicted of offenses against the state, and remit fines and forfeitures imposed for such offenses. However, a first offender convicted of a non-violent crime, or convicted of aggravated battery, second degree battery, aggravated assault, mingling harmful substances, aggravated criminal damage to property, purse snatching, extortion, or illegal use of weapons or dangerous instrumentalities never previously convicted of a felony shall be pardoned automatically upon completion of his sentence, without a recommendation of the Board of Pardons and without action by the governor.

(emphasis added).

This section of the Louisiana Constitution grants those never before convicted of a felony to automatically receive a “first offender pardon” under several circumstances:

(1) If they are convicted of a “non-violent crime”

Crimes of violence are defined in Louisiana Revised Statutes §14:2 as: “an offense that has, as an element, the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, and that, by its very nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense or an offense that involves the possession or use of a dangerous weapon.”

La. R.S. 14:2 further gives an enumerated list of crimes the legislature defines as “crimes of violence”:

(1) Solicitation for murder.

(2) First degree murder.

(3) Second degree murder.

(4) Manslaughter.

(5) Aggravated battery.

(6) Second degree battery.

(7) Aggravated assault.

(8) Aggravated kidnapping of a child.

(9) Aggravated or first degree rape.

(10) Forcible or second degree rape.

(11) Simple or third degree rape.

(12) Sexual battery.

(13) Second degree sexual battery.

(14) Intentional exposure to AIDS virus.

(15) Aggravated kidnapping.

(16) Second degree kidnapping.

(17) Simple kidnapping.

(18) Aggravated arson.

(19) Aggravated criminal damage to property.

(20) Aggravated burglary.

(21) Armed robbery.

(22) First degree robbery.

(23) Simple robbery.

(24) Purse snatching.

(25) False imprisonment; offender armed with dangerous weapon.

(26) Assault by drive-by shooting.

(27) Aggravated crime against nature.

(28) Carjacking.

(29) Molestation of a juvenile or a person with a physical or mental disability.

(30) Terrorism.

(31) Aggravated second degree battery.

(32) Aggravated assault upon a peace officer.

(33) Aggravated assault with a firearm.

(34) Armed robbery; use of firearm; additional penalty.

(35) Second degree robbery.

(36) Disarming of a peace officer.

(37) Stalking.

(38) Second degree cruelty to juveniles.

(39) Aggravated flight from an officer.

(40) Sexual battery of persons with infirmities.

(41) Battery of a police officer.

(42) Trafficking of children for sexual purposes.

(43) Human trafficking.

(44) Home invasion.

(45) Domestic abuse aggravated assault.

(46) Vehicular homicide, when the operator's blood alcohol concentration exceeds 0.20 percent by weight based on grams of alcohol per one hundred cubic centimeters of blood.

(47) Aggravated assault upon a dating partner.

(48) Domestic abuse battery punishable under R.S. 14:35.3(L), (M)(2), (N), (O), or (P).

(49) Battery of a dating partner punishable under R.S. 14:34.9(L), (M)(2), (N), (O), or (P).

(50) Violation of a protective order punishable under R.S. 14:79(C).

(51) Criminal abortion.

(52) First degree feticide.

(53) Second degree feticide.

(54) Third degree feticide.

(55) Aggravated abortion by dismemberment.

(56) Battery of emergency room personnel, emergency services personnel, or a healthcare professional.

(57) Possession of a firearm or carrying of a concealed weapon by a person convicted of certain felonies in violation of R.S. 14:95.1(D).

(58) Distribution of fentanyl or carfentanil punishable under R.S. 40:967(B)(4)(b).

(59) Distribution of heroin punishable under R.S. 40:966(B)(3)(b).

La R.S. 14:2(B). All individuals convicted of the crimes listed above will not receive a first offender pardon unless:

(2) They are convicted of “aggravated battery, second degree battery, aggravated assault, mingling harmful substances, aggravated criminal damage to property, purse snatching, extortion, or illegal use of weapons or dangerous instrumentalities” because the legislature explicitly excluded these offense and allows for first offender pardons for these convictions.

A First Offender Pardon is not like a Pardon with restoration of gun rights signed by the Governor because it does not restore an individual’s right to possess a firearm under either State or Federal law. Nor does it impact that person’s right to vote as voting rights are restored for all felons immediately upon completion of their sentence as of other legislation that was passed several years ago.

At this point, the only effect a first offender pardon appears to have is that it allows an individual to file for an expungement of a felony conviction immediately upon receiving his pardon, rather than having to wait 10 years to establish a clean record as would otherwise by required by Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 978.

If you or someone you know has received a first offender pardon and would like to know if you are eligible for an expungement, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to set up a consult.

Since it is the new year, we always like to take this time when people are thinking about “new year, new me,” to talk about expungements.

An expungement, in Louisiana, is a process by which an individual with an arrest on his record may, under certain circumstances, remove that arrest record from public view on his rap sheet. It is important to note that in Louisiana an expungement does not make it like the arrest never happened. The arrest record can still be seen by law enforcement and the court system (and therefore, if the person was convicted, can be used against them as a predicate offense for purposes of multiple offender sentencing, for example) and there are many state agencies which are exempt from the expungement order and will still be able to see the record (the Louisiana State Bar Association, Louisiana State Nursing & Medical Boards, and Insurance Board, just to name a few).

There are three types of arrest records that may be eligible for expungement:

1. An arrest that did not result in a conviction

2. An arrest that resulted in a misdemeanor conviction.

3. An arrest that resulted in a felony conviction.

Each has slightly different rules and regulations:

An Arrest That Did Not Result in a Conviction:

"A. A person may file a motion to expunge a record of his arrest for a felony or misdemeanor offense that did not result in a conviction if any of the following apply:

(1) The person was not prosecuted for the offense for which he was arrested, and the limitations on the institution of prosecution have barred the prosecution for that offense.

(2) The district attorney for any reason declined to prosecute any offense arising out of that arrest, including the reason that the person successfully completed a pretrial diversion program.

(3) Prosecution was instituted and such proceedings have been finally disposed of by dismissal, sustaining of a motion to quash, or acquittal.

(4) The person was judicially determined to be factually innocent and entitled to compensation for a wrongful conviction pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 15:572.8. The person may seek to have the arrest and conviction which formed the basis for the wrongful conviction expunged without the limitations or time delays imposed by the provisions of this Article or any other provision of law to the contrary."

La CCrP ART. 976.

An Arrest That Resulted in a Conviction of a Misdemeanor:

A. A person may file a motion to expunge his record of arrest and conviction of a misdemeanor offense if either of the following apply:

(1) The conviction was set aside and the prosecution was dismissed pursuant to Article 894(B) of this Code.

(2) More than five years have elapsed since the person completed any sentence, deferred adjudication, or period of probation or parole, and the person has not been convicted of any felony offense during the five-year period, and has no felony charge pending against him. The motion filed pursuant to this Subparagraph shall include a certification obtained from the district attorney which verifies that to his knowledge the applicant has no felony convictions during the five-year period and no pending felony charges under a bill of information or indictment.

La CCrP Art. 977(A). However, there are some exceptions to the above rules: Expungements of convictions arising from circumstances involving or as the result of an arrest for a sex offense and convictions for domestic abuse battery and stalking are not eligible for expungement under any circumstances. La CCrP Art. 977(C).

An Arrest That Resulted in a Felony Conviction

A. Except as provided in Paragraph B of this Article, a person may file a motion to expunge his record of arrest and conviction of a felony offense if any of the following apply:

(1) The conviction was set aside and the prosecution was dismissed pursuant to Article 893(E).

(2) More than ten years have elapsed since the person completed any sentence, deferred adjudication, or period of probation or parole based on the felony conviction, and the person has not been convicted of any other criminal offense during the ten-year period, and has no criminal charge pending against him. The motion filed pursuant to this Subparagraph shall include a certification obtained from the district attorney which verifies that, to his knowledge, the applicant has no convictions during the ten-year period and no pending charges under a bill of information or indictment.

(3) The person is entitled to a first offender pardon for the offense pursuant to Article IV, Section 5(E)(1) of the Constitution of Louisiana, provided that the offense is not defined as a crime of violence pursuant to R.S. 14:2(B) or a sex offense pursuant to R.S. 15:541.

La CCrP Art. 978(A). Just as in the case of misdemeanor convictions, there are exceptions to these eligibility requirements, as well:

• Crimes of violence, unless an exception to this exception applies (yes, I know. I’ll get to that.)

• A sex offense or crime against a victim who is a minor as defined in the sex offender registry statute.

• Violations of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law, except: simple possession, possession with intent to distribute, if the possible term of imprisonment is less than five years, if the person was sentenced pursuant to Article 893, or if the person is eligible for a first offender pardon for the offense.

• Domestic abuse battery.

La CCrP Art. 978(B). The crimes of violence exception (the first bullet point above) allows for the expungement of only the following crimes of violence: aggravated battery, second degree battery, aggravated criminal damage to property, simple robbery, purse snatching, or illegal use of weapons or dangerous instrumentalities; if all of the following conditions are also met:

(a) More than ten years have elapsed since the person completed any sentence, deferred adjudication, or period of probation or parole based on the felony conviction.

(b) The person has not been convicted of any other criminal offense during the ten-year period.

(c) The person has no criminal charge pending against him.

La CCrP Art. 978(E)(1).

If you are interested in seeing if you are eligible for an expungement, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consult.

Or…do you have to give a breath sample when you’re pulled over for DWI?

The short answer: Yes and no.

Louisiana Revised Statutes §32:661 states: "Any person, regardless of age, who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent, subject to the provisions of R.S. 32:662, to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath, urine, or other bodily substance for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood, and the presence of any abused substance or controlled dangerous substance as set forth in R.S. 40:964 in his blood if arrested for any offense arising out of acts alleged to have been committed while the person was driving or in actual physical control of a motor vehicle while believed to be under the influence of alcoholic beverages or any abused substance or controlled dangerous substance as set forth in R.S. 40:964." La. R.S. § 32:661(A)(1).

The rest of this statute contains the requirements a law enforcement officer must meet (including advising an arrestee of the consequences of submitting to or refusing the requested chemical test for intoxication) in order for the subsequent test to be admissible in court and also for that test to be used to suspend the arrestee’s driver’s license.

In Louisiana, if a person under arrest for DWI who is asked to submit to a chemical test refuses to provide one, her driver’s license will be suspended. For the first refusal, her license will be suspended for 365 days. For the second or subsequent refusal (within 10 years of each other), her license will be suspended for 730 days.

If a person submits to a chemical test and the result is below .08 (for a person 21 years or older) or below .02 (for a person under 21 years old), his license will not be suspended.

If a person 21 years old or older submits to a chemical test for the first time and the result is over .08, depending on the additional circumstances (whether this was a first, second, or subsequent submission to a chemical test within 10 years; whether the results were above .08 or above .20; etc…), his license will be suspended for a period ranging from 90 days to 4 years, depending on the circumstances. (The DMV puts all of their regulations online here and the specific regulation governing chemical tests can be found here.)

Also, any test results that comply with the procedural requirements laid out in Louisiana Revised Statutes, Title 32, Chapter 3, Part XIV, are admissible in court and many allow the State a presumption that the driver whose test results they are was intoxicated at the time she was driving.

The longer answer to the question posed above, then, is that, no, you do not have to give a breath sample when you are arrested for driving while intoxicated; however, there may be serious consequences to your driving privileges if you do not. That said, if you do give a breath sample, there may be serious criminal consequences and consequences to your driving privileges if the results are above the legal limit.

If you or someone you know has been arrested for driving while intoxicated and you would like to schedule a consult, please give us a call at (318) 459-9111.

Since it is the season for holiday parties, it seemed prudent to remind you all that DWI Checkpoints are legal in Louisiana and have been determined to be so by the Louisiana Supreme Court since 2000. In State v. Jackson, 2000-0015 (La. 7/6/00); 764 So.2d 64, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that DWI checkpoints could satisfy the limitations of the Louisiana constitution if they met certain requirements:

[W]e set forth the following guidelines for evaluating whether the checkpoint's intrusiveness will withstand constitutional muster under the Fourth Amendment and Louisiana's Article I, § 5:17

(1) the location, time and duration of a checkpoint, and other regulations for operation of the checkpoint, preferably in written form, established by supervisory or other administrative personnel rather than the field officers implementing the checkpoint;

(2) advance warning to the approaching motorist with signs, flares and other indications to warn of the impending stop in a safe manner and to provide notice of its official nature as a police checkpoint;

(3) detention of the motorist for a minimal length of time; and

(4) use of a systematic nonrandom criteria for stopping motorists.

In evaluating a checkpoint under this test, the guiding principle must be that the procedures utilized curtail the unbridled discretion of the officer in the field. Prouse, 440 U.S. at 662, 99 S.Ct. 1391; **12 Brown, 443 U.S. at 51, 99 S.Ct. 2637.

State v. Jackson, 2000-0015 (La. 7/6/00, 11–12); 764 So.2d 64, 72–73.

Subsequently, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal held that the act of attempting to avoid a checkpoint was sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion to detain a driver and conduct further investigation.

If you are out celebrating the holidays with friends and loved ones, please drive carefully and safely.

And if you would like to set up a consult, give us a call at (318) 459-9111.

During the 2022 Regular Legislative Session, the Louisiana Legislature made a few changes to various criminal offenses as well as a couple of additions.

The legislature amended the penalty provisions of Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §56 - Simple criminal damage to property - to state that when the offense involves “damage to multiple properties by a number of distinct acts of the offender which are part of a continuous sequence of events, the aggregate amount of the damages shall determine the grade of the offense.” La. R.S. 14:56(C).

The legislature amended Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §34.2 - Battery of a police officer and §108.2 - Resisting a police officer with force or violence - to include “juvenile detention facility officers” in its definition of “police officer.” La. R.S. 14:34.2

The legislature amended Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §40.1 - Terrorizing - to add the crime of “Menacing.”

“Menacing is the intentional communication of information that the commission of a crime of violence, as defined in R.S. 14:2(B), is imminent or in progress or that a circumstance dangerous to human life exists or is about to exist, when committed under any of the following circumstances:

(a) the actions of the offender cause members of the general public to be in sustained fear for their safety, and a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause such sustained fear.

(b) the actions of the offender cause the evacuation of a building, a public structure, or a facility of transportation, and a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause an evacuation.

(c) The actions of the offender cause any other serious disruption to the general public, an a reasonable person would have known that such actions could cause serious disruption to the general public.”

La. R.S. 14:40.1(B)(1). The penalty for this offense is a fine of not more than $1,000 and/or imprisonment with or without hard labor for not more than 2 years. La. R.S. 14:40.1(B)(2).

The Louisiana Legislature also added Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §67.12, which criminalizes the “Theft of a catalytic converter or engine control module.”

If you or someone you know is facing criminal prosecution, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Effective August 1, 2022, the Louisiana Legislature amended several provisions of the Louisiana Children’s Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure to define a “child” as a person under the age of 18. These changes primarily impact the videotaping of statements of witnesses or victims in criminal cases.

This act also amended Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 571.1 to establish that the prescriptive period (time within which the case must be initiated) for the following offenses is 30 years when the victim is under the age of 18 and does not begin to run until the victim reaches the age of 18:

• attempted first degree rape,

• attempted second degree rape,

• sexual battery,

• second degree sexual battery,

• oral sexual battery,

• human trafficking,

• trafficking of children for sexual purposes,

• felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile,

• indecent behavior with juveniles,

• pornography involving juveniles,

• molestation of a juvenile or a person with a physical or mental disability,

• prostitution of persons under eighteen,

• enticing persons into prostitution,

• crime against nature,

• aggravated crime against nature, and

• crime against nature by solicitation.

La. C.Cr.P. Art. 571.1.

If you or someone you know is facing prosecution for a crime against a juvenile, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Effective August 1, 2022, the Louisiana Legislature made it an affirmative duty of law enforcement to fingerprint those arrested for Driving While Intoxicated.

"It shall be the duty of the sheriff of every parish, the chief of police of each municipality, and every chief officer of every other law enforcement agency operating within this state to record the fingerprints of all persons arrested for any offense involving the operation of a vehicle while intoxicated, including local ordinances pertaining to operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated.”

La. R.S. 15:545(A)(3).

If you or someone you know is facing prosecution for a driving while intoxicated offense, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Effective August 1, 2022, the Louisiana Legislature made some changes to the drug laws.

With regard to marijuana, the legislature enacted Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 162.4 to state explicitly that the mere odor of marijuana is insufficient to provide probable cause for the search of a person’s home without a warrant. La. C.Cr.P. Art. 162.4

The legislature further enacted La. R.S. 32:300.4.1 which prohibits the smoking or vaping of marijuana in a motor vehicle. The fine for violating this statute is $100. The statute further prohibits officers from using this offense as the primary basis for a traffic stop, and establishes it as a non-moving violation which shall not be reported on a person’s driving record. La. R.S. 32:300.4.1.

The Legislature also re-categorized several controlled substances on the drug schedules, notably moving fentanyl to Schedule I. La. R.S. 40:964.

Finally, the Legislature amended Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §403.10 to provide immunity for prosecution for those seeking medical treatment for an individual believed to be suffering from an overdose for the offense of possession of drug paraphernalia. The change also prohibits individuals from seeking medical treatment for an individual suffering an overdose from violations of probation or parole or civil forfeiture of property.

If you or someone you know is facing prosecution for violations of the controlled dangerous substances laws, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Effective today, Act 486 of the 2022 Louisiana Legislative Regular Session, amends several state statutes to allow those with criminal convictions to seek review of their conviction by certain state licensing agencies to determine whether they will be denied for the license before spending money to obtain any necessary educational requirements.

Previously, Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 37, §33 simply allowed an “ex-offender” to apply for a state license to perform certain work that required one. The law now states:

“An individual convicted of a crime may request at any time including before obtaining any required education or training, that an entity. issuing licenses to engage in certain fields of work pursuant to state law determine whether the individual’s criminal conviction disqualifies the individual from obtaining a license issued or conferred by the licensing entity.”

La. R.S. 37:33(A). Within 45 days, the licensing agency must notify the applicant whether, “based on the criminal record information submitted, the individual is disqualified from receiving or holding the license about which the individual inquired.” La. R.S. 37:33(B)(1)

The written notice must include:

(1) The specific conviction that is the basis for the intended denial.

(2) The reasons the conviction was determined to be directly related to the licensed activity, including findings for each of the factors provided in R.S. 37:2950 that the licensing authority deemed relevant to the determination.

(3) The right to submit additional evidence relevant to each of the factors listed in R.S. 37:2950 within sixty days, which the licensing authority shall consider before issuing a final determination.

La. R.S. 37:34(A). The final determination must be in writing and give the applicant notice of the right to appeal and notice of the earliest date on which she can reapply. La. R.S. 37:34(B).

The factors that must be considered by each agency are:

(a) The nature and seriousness of the offense.

(b) The nature of the specific duties and responsibilities for which the license, permit, or certificate is required.

(3) (sic) The amount of time that has passed since the conviction.

(4) (sic) Facts relevant to the circumstances of the offense, including any aggravating or mitigating circumstances or social conditions surrounding the commission of the offense.

(5) (sic) Evidence of rehabilitation or treatment undertaken by the person since conviction.

La. R.S. 37:2950(A)(2).

The following agencies are not subject to this change: the State Boxing and Wrestling Commission; the Louisiana Gaming Control Board; the Louisiana Lottery Corporation; the Louisiana State Racing Commission; the office of charitable gaming, Department of Revenue; and the gaming enforcement division, office of state police, Department of Public Safety and Corrections. La. R.S. 37:36(C).

If you or someone you know is facing criminal prosecution and has questions about its impact on your career, call us at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

The Legislature during the 2022 Regular Session passed several bills that altered the Illegal Carrying of a Weapons statute.

Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 14, §95 prohibits the carrying of a weapon under certain circumstances. Act No. 126, which took effect on May 26, 2022, expanded the exceptions in subsection K. Subsection K previously permitted retired members of the judiciary, retired district attorneys, and retired legislators to carry concealed weapons provided they qualify annually in the use of firearms by the Council on Peace Officer Standards and Training and carry valid identification of their retired status. Act 126 extends this exception to now include retired federal judges, justices, and United States attorneys and assistant United States attorneys, and retired federal investigators.

Effective August 1, 2022, additional exceptions were made to allow “city prosecutors, designated assistant city prosecutors, a United States representative from Louisiana and his designated, employed congressional staffer, a United States senator from Louisiana and his designated, employed congressional staffer” and “retired members of the United States Congress” to carry concealed weapons provided they meet the same training requirements as stated above.

Act 587 further altered 14:95 to repeal the prohibitions against carrying a “switchblade” knife. Finally, Act 465 makes “possession of a firearm or carrying of a concealed weapon by a person convicted of certain felonies in violation of La. R.S. 14:95(D)” a crime of violence pursuant to La. R.S. 14:2. La. R.S. 14:95(D) states: “If a violation of this Section is committed during the commission of a crime of violence as defined in R.S. 14:2(B), and the defendant has a prior conviction of a crime of violence, then the violation of this Section shall be designated as a crime of violence.” La. R.S. 14:95(D).

If you or someone you know is facing a prosecution for possession of a firearm, give us a call at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Effective June 16, 2022, the Louisiana Legislature passed and Governor John Bel Edwards signed into law Act 494, which regulates the publication of booking photos of arrested individuals. Act 494 enacts Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 234.

Article 234 prohibits Louisiana law enforcement agencies from releasing booking photographs of individuals to a person requesting a copy unless it is subject to one of the following exceptions:

“(a) The individual is a fugitive, and a law enforcement officer or agency determines that releasing or disseminating the booking photograph will assist in apprehending the individual.

(b) A law enforcement officer or agency determines that the individual is an imminent threat to an individual or to public safety and determines that releasing or disseminating the booking photograph will assist in reducing or eliminating the threat.

(c) A judge of a court of competent jurisdiction orders the release or dissemination of the booking photograph based on a finding that the release or dissemination is in furtherance of a legitimate interest.

(d) The individual is convicted of or pleads guilty or nolo contendere to a crime, lesser crime, or lesser included offense as defined in Article 558 in response to the same crime for which he was arrested or if there is criminal litigation related to the same crime that is pending or reasonably anticipated.

(e) The individual is charged with a crime of violence as defined in R.S. 14:2(B), except stalking, or charged with any of the following offenseS:

(i) Sex offenses as defined in R.S. 15:541.

(ii) Human trafficking offenses as defined in R.S. 14:46.2 and 46.3.

(ii) Offenses affecting the public health and morals of minors, R.S. 14:91 et seq.

(iv) Offenses affecting the health and safety of persons with infirmities, R.S. 14:93.3 et seq.

(v) Video voyeurism.

(vi) Cruelty to animals.

(vii) Dogfighting.”

La CCrP Art. 234(C)(1). If a law enforcement agency publishes a booking photo pursuant to one of these exceptions and prior to a conviction, it must contain the disclaimer: “all persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty.” La CCrP Art 234(C)(3). This statute further requires “remove-for-pay” websites to remove booking photographs without payment under certain circumstances and establishes that failure to do so will subject the website to prosecution for extortion pursuant to Louisiana Revised States Title 14, §66.

If you or someone you know has been arrested and is seeking criminal representation, call our office at (318) 459-9111 to schedule a consultation.

Terence Tekoh worked as a patient transporter for a hospital in Los Angeles. A patient accused him of sexual assault. The Los Angeles Police Department, upon receiving the report, sent Deputy Carlos Vega to the hospital to interview Tekoh. Deputy Vega took a statement from Tekoh without advising Tekoh of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona.

Tekoh was acquitted after trial and filed a lawsuit against Vega for violating his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. A jury found in favor of Vega in the civil trial. Tekoh appealed and the Ninth Circuit vacated the decision and remanded for a new trial.

The US Supreme Court considered the question:

Is the use of an un-Mirandized statement against a defendant in a criminal case sufficient support a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action?

Source: Oyez.org.

The Supreme Court held on June 22, 2022, that the use of an un-Mirandized statement against a defendant in a criminal case is not sufficient to support a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. A defendant may not sue an officer in civil court for failing to advise him of his Miranda rights; however, the statement is still subject to suppression in the criminal proceeding against him.

Merle Denezpi, a member of the Navajo Tribe, pled guilty to an assault charge in the Court of Indian Affairs. Subsequently, he was indicted in federal court for charges arising from the same set of facts. He was convicted and sentenced to 30 years in prison.

He challenged his conviction in federal court alleging that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution prohibited his subsequent conviction in federal court after he was convicted in the Court of Indian Affairs.

The question pending before the Supreme Court this term is:

Does a prosecution in the Court of Indian Offenses trigger the Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause?

Source: Oyez.org

In 1997, William Wooden broke into a storage facility and stole objects from 10 different storage units. He was charged with and subsequently pled guilty to 10 counts of burglary. In 2014, officers found him in possession of a rifle and charged him with being a felon in possession of a firearm and was indicted by a federal court. After trial, and during his sentencing hearing, Wooden was determined to be an Armed Career Criminal in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and 924(e).

The Supreme Court addressed the following question:

Are offenses committed as part of a single criminal spree but sequentially in time “committed on occasions different from one another” for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act?

In a unanimous decision drafted by Justice Kagan, the Court found that offenses committed as part of a single criminal episode did not occur on different “occasions” and thus count as only one offense for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act.

Source: Oyez.org.

Larry Thompson was arrested for resisting an officer and obstructing governmental administration after he refused to allow officers entry into his home when they told him they did not have a warrant. He spent two days in jail and after three months his case was dismissed. The initial complaint was made by his sister-in-law who believed diaper rash on her nephew was a sign of abuse. After EMTs arrived on scene and found nothing wrong, four law enforcement officers arrived and Mr. Thompson, who did not know about his sister-in-law’s call, denied them entry, resulting in his arrest.

After his case was dismissed, Mr. Thompson filed a lawsuit against the officers for malicious prosecution. The trial court dismissed the case because it found that a dismissal was not a proceeding that “formally ended in a manner not inconsistent with his innocence,” or “ended in a manner that affirmatively indicates his innocence”.

In a 6-3 decision authored by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court held that an acquittal was not required to sustain an §1983 action.

Source: Oyez.org

In April 2006, two men got into a fight with several other people in the Bronx. Shortly thereafter, someone opened fire with a 9 millimeter handgun and a child in a passing car was killed. Nicholas Morris was identified by witnesses as the shooter and pursuant to a warrant, officers found a 9 millimeter cartridge and ammunition for a .357 revolver in his home. They did not find the weapon. Morris’ trial ended in a mistrial and rather than re-try him, Morris pled to possessing a firearm at the scene of the shooting. Because the prosecution did not have sufficient evidence to prove possession of a firearm at the scene, Morris testified during the plea that he possessed a .357 revolver at the scene.

In 2013, Darrell Hemphill was charged with the murder. At trial, Hemphill presented evidence that a 9 millimeter cartridge was located at Morris’ home shortly after the shooting. In response, the State presented the testimony of Morris at his plea that he had possessed a .357 revolver at the scene.

Hemphill appealed and the question presented to the United States Supreme Court was:

When, if ever, does a criminal defendant who “opens the door” to evidence that would otherwise be barred by the rules of evidence also forfeit his right to exclude evidence otherwise barred by the Confrontation Clause?

The Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, held:

The Confrontation Clause of the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to confront witnesses against them, and the Court has recognized no open-ended exceptions to this requirement—only those exceptions established at the time of the founding. In People v. Reid, New York’s highest court held that a criminal defendant “opens the door” to evidence that would otherwise be inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause if the evidence was “reasonably necessary” to correct a misleading impression made by the defense’s argument. Contrary to the State’s contention, the Reid rule is not merely procedural, but a substantive principle of evidence that dictates what material is relevant and admissible. Such an exception is antithetical to the Confrontation Clause.

Source: Oyez.com.

In Lousiana, some cases are tried by a judge and some are tried by a jury. The dividing line between the two are that cases in which the defendant may be sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor must be tried by a jury, unless the defendant waives that right and chooses to be tried by a judge. This is solely the defendant’s right to waive. The State cannot force a defendant to give up his right to trial by jury.

In Louisiana, jury trials are also broken down into two types: 6-person juries and 12-person juries.

A defendant is entitled to a 12-person jury trial when the charge for which he is being prosecuted is either capital (meaning he can be executed or imprisoned at hard labor for life) or if the sentence requires that he be sentenced to hard labor. If the potential punishment only carries the possibility of imprisonment at hard labor, then the defendant is only entitled to a trial by 6 jurors.

See Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 782.