FAQ - What is Hearsay?

(All right, y’all. Full disclosure. Everyone hates hearsay. It is confusing. The exceptions are even MORE confusing. This is a very quick summation of the Rules of Evidence that define it and set up the exceptions.)

Hearsay is defined in Chapter 8 of the Louisiana Code of Evidence. Article 801 defines hearsay as: “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the present trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Hearsay is generally not admissible, though there are exceptions, which we will discuss in our next blog posts. (La CE Art. 802, 803 & 804)

Some statements, despite being made outside of the present trial or hearing, are not hearsay, according to Article 801, and are therefore admissible:

• In a criminal case, a prior statement that is inconsistent with his testimony at the trial or hearing at which the declarant is testifying. In order for the prior inconsistent statement to be admissible, it must be brought to the attention of the declarant, and he must have been given the opportunity to admit the fact and there must be additional evidence to corroborate the prior statement.

• a prior statement that is consistent with his present testimony that is used to rebut allegations that he has recently fabricated this statement or that he has been improperly influenced or has an ulterior motive for his present testimony.

• A statement that is one of identification after seeing the person.

• An initial complaint of sexually assaultive behavior that is consistent with the declarant’s present testimony.

• A statement made during a Sexual Assault Nurse Examination (SANE) that has been documented in a report.

• A statement offered against a party that is:

  • That party’s statement;

  • A statement which the party has adopted or manifested his belief in its truth; or

  • A statement by the party’s authorized representative.

• A statement offered against a party that is:

  • Made by an agent or employee of the party concerning a matter within the scope of his employment and made during his term of employment; or

  • A statement made by a declarant while participating in a conspiracy to which the party is a co-conspirator after a prima facie case of conspiracy has been established.

• Statements that are events speaking for themselves under the immediate pressure of the occurrence.

The general rule is that a statement made outside of court (intended to be introduced at court to prove that the subject matter of the statement is true) is not admissible.

If you would like to set up a consult, give us a call at (318) 459-9111.